Interviews
News Wire
Schedule
Training & Conditioning
Book Reviews
2008 Olympics

Who Will Win?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
"He hit me 18 times while I was in the act of falling." - Max Barr, on Joe Louis

September 6
At Houston (HBO): Juan Diaz vs. Michael Katsidis, 10 rounds, lightweights; Jorge Barrios vs. Rocky Juarez, 10 rounds, junior lightweights

September 13
At Las Vegas (HBO PPV): Joel Casamayor vs. Juan Manuel Marquez, 12 rounds, for Casamayor's Ring magazine lightweight title; Sergio Mora vs. Vernon Forrest, rematch, 12 rounds, for Mora's WBC junior middleweight title

For a complete schedule and list of upcoming fights, please visit Upcoming Events.

 

 Bernard Hopkins - Will it Ever Come to an End?

BoxingInsider.com
Bernard Hopkins - Will it Ever Come to an End?
Published by BoxingInsider

Saturday, April 19th, 2008 at 6:22 am

Charles Jay

Joe Calzaghe is really not my kind of fighter. He looks kind of awkward. He’s not an especially hard hitter. He throws those annoying little pitty-pat punches.

He’s also white. And as Bernard Hopkins has let us know, he “will never lose to a white guy.”

But guess what? He’s about to.

Hopkins has been an outstanding champion in the past - a guy who held a dominant position in the middleweight division. But when putting his career in its proper perspective, it deserved a nuanced exploration. When my reporter friend Patrick Kehoe asked me my opinion of Hopkins a few years ago, this is part of what I said:

“….He is an outstanding fighter - tough, durable, hard-nosed, and a credit to the sport inside the ring. He is a very solid champion. And when he is eligible, he will get my Hall of Fame vote. That won’t be because of all his title defenses (Orlando Canizales and Virgil Hill had a lot of title defenses too, but they would be, at best, just borderline candidates in my mind), but because in addition to the above attributes, it can be said that he was the best in his weight division for a period of more than ten years.


However, I cannot consider him to be an ‘all-time’ great, if that barometer means that he be rated among my top ten middleweights ever. Certainly he is not the equal of Jones, Harry Greb, Mickey Walker, Sugar Ray Robinson, Charley Burley, Stanley Ketchel, Carlos Monzon, Marcel Cerdan, Marvin Hagler, Tommy Ryan, Jake LaMotta, or Emile Griffith. Bob Fitzimmons, Frank Klaus, and Nonpareil Jack Dempsey might belong on that list too. Ezzard Charles was probably a better middleweight. So was Sam Langford. So was Archie Moore. So was Robert Villemain. And how about Tony Zale, Teddy Yarosz, Jeff Smith, Al Hostak, or Ken Overlin? What about Laszlo Papp? And other non-champions like Holman Williams, Cocoa Kid, and Lloyd Marshall - guys who paid their dues and never got a title shot - deserve to be mentioned in the same category. Sugar Ray Leonard, at 160 pounds, would have outclassed him. Thomas Hearns may have bludgeoned him, if he got to him early in the fight. Hopkins would probably have had entertaining fights with the likes of Gene Fullmer, Rodrigo Valdez, Nino Benvenuti, Joey Giardello, Carmen Basilio, and Dick Tiger, but I don’t know that he necessarily belongs so far ahead of them in the pecking order. The same Roberto Duran who beat Iran Barkley at 160 and was ahead on points late in the fight with Hagler may have used his cleverness to take Hopkins to school. John Mugabi was a hard-enough hitter to take Hopkins out. The same can be said for Ruben Carter.”I don’t know that my opinion is any different now. As you can see, I don’t fall into the idiocy of commentators like Jim Lampley, who have called Hopkins one of the five greatest middleweights ever.

He isn’t.

The truth is, while I have tremendous respect for Hopkins, and admire the fact that he was able to move up in weight and beat Antonio Tarver at the light heavyweight level. But in a sense, Hopkins has gotten something of a free ride over the last several years. He’s gotten to face a couple of welterweights who were in effect moving up, in Oscar De La Hoya and Felix Trinidad, on which he has built an enhanced reputation. He was able to face a rather non-aggressive challenger in Jermain Taylor, who was tentative enough to allow Hopkins to keep things close on the scorecards. Tarver just didn’t look like he showed up to fight, and as we have seen in his own recent bouts, Tarver is pretty mich a shot fighter. And Winky Wright, who had moved from junior middleweight to middleweight to 170 pounds, is the type of fighter who is willing to wait on his opponent and counter-punch.

What I am saying is, Hopkins hasn’t had to fight a bigger, more aggressive fighter who was going to take the fight to him and make him work for every second of the round. If you watch Hopkins, his whole game these days is built around being able to completely dictate the pace; in other words, to fight when HE wants to fight, and to do it in spurts. In a way, that’s what you have to do when you are in your forties. When you have an opponent in front of you who cooperates with that; who is willing to sit back and throw a punch here, a punch there, that kind of approach can work.

But I simply don’t see that approach working against Calzaghe. Like I said at the top, Calzaghe is not exactly my kind of fighter. He’s not the type of guy I look at and say, “Boy, he’s an all-time great.” And I don’t think my opinion in that regard is going to change, no matter how this fight turns out. I know that he and Hopkins have had 20 title defenses, and that they held their respective titles for over 10 years. But I think maybe that is more of a commentary on the overall quality of boxing in this day and age. Neither fighter has had to fight one excruciating title defense after another, like the fighters of thirty or forty years ago. You couldn’t tell me for an instant that a Robinson, a Leonard, an Ezzard Charles, couldn’t have cleaned both their clocks, whether it be at 160 or 168 pounds.

But I will say this about Calzaghe - he is an efficient fighter, better than he looks. and he doesn’t have to be good enough to beat Marvin Hagler or Sugar Ray Leonard on Saturday night. he only has to be good enough to beat 43-year-old Bernard Hopkins.

Calzaghe is also busy. Oh, is he ever busy! There is no way on earth that he is going to stand there and let Hopkins dart in and out, running about the ring, winning rounds with three or four punches. He’s just not going to allow it. He will throw a ton of punches, without regard to whether they’re landing on the button, and without regard to what Hopkins may counter with, because at 168 pounds, Hopkins isn’t taking in a lot of power. And he will connect with enough of them to impress the judges with his level of activity. Regardless of whether he is hurting Hopkins, if he is the busier guy, he is going to get the nod on those scorecards.

He simply isn’t going to allow Hopkins to steal this one. To me, the style of Calzaghe is the type that is going to win a fight by a margin, because he doesn’t seem to get very tired. In fact, only two of his championship fights have seen the opponent get to within six points on all three judges’ cards. That’s what we call consistency.

To me, there’s only one result in this one, and that is CALZAGHE BY DECISION.

And what will Bernard say about the white guys THEN?

—————-

Bet the Hopkins-Calzaghe fight at BetUS

BetUS Boxing Betting odds:

Light Heavyweights - 12 Rounds
JOE CALZAGHE -300
BERNARD HOPKINS +220

OVER 11.5 ROUNDS -400
UNDER 11.5 ROUNDS +250


Most Recent Posts:
 
Most Recent Headlines Posted:


BET HOPKINS VS. PAVLIK | Get A Credit Card | Rumble Poker | 2008 Olympic Boxing Tickets | Pavlik vs. Hopkins Tickets




 Copyright 2008 BoxingInsider.com

Home | News Wire | Headlines | Biofiles | Columns | Odds | Almanac | Ring Girls | Store | Directory | Contact Us